A comparison of arm-based and contrast-based models for network meta-analysis
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons
- Hans van Houwelingen and the art of summing up
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1834445 (Why is no real title available?)
- Modeling between-trial variance structure in mixed treatment comparisons
- The use of two-way linear mixed models in multitreatment meta-analysis
Cited in
(8)- A review and comparison of arm-based versus contrast-based network meta-analysis for binary outcomes -- understanding their differences and limitations
- The impact of covariance priors on arm-based Bayesian network meta-analyses with binary outcomes
- Bayesian network meta-regression hierarchical models using heavy-tailed multivariate random effects with covariate-dependent variances
- Network meta-analysis of rare events using penalized likelihood regression
- Network meta-analysis with individual participant-level data of time-to-event outcomes using Cox regression
- Network meta-analysis of time-to-event endpoints with individual participant data using restricted mean survival time regression
- Non-parametric Bayesian approach to multiple treatment comparisons in network meta-analysis with application to comparisons of anti-depressants
- One-stage individual participant data meta-analysis models for continuous and binary outcomes: comparison of treatment coding options and estimation methods
This page was built for publication: A comparison of arm-based and contrast-based models for network meta-analysis
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6627244)