A comparison of mesh morphing methods for 3D shape optimization

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-24734-7_16MaRDI QIDQ7357170zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors M. L. Staten, S. J. Owen, Suzanne M. Shontz, A. Salinger, Todd Coffey

Publication date 25 September 2026

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24734-7_16

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Numerical analysis (65-XX)

Cites work

• A mesh morphing technique for geometrically dissimilar tessellated surfaces
• Achieving finite element mesh quality via optimization of the Jacobian matrix norm and associated quantities. Part I?a framework for surface mesh optimization
• Adaptive tetrahedral meshing in free-surface flow
• Aircraft control surface deflection using RBF-based mesh deformation
• Algorithm 907
• Analysis of and workarounds for element reversal for a finite element-based algorithm for warping triangular and tetrahedral meshes
• Automatic mesh update with the solid-extension mesh moving technique
• BMSweep: Locating interior nodes during sweeping
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5060482 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 964349 (Why is no real title available?)
• Mesh deformation using the biharmonic operator
• Mesh Moving Techniques for Fluid-Structure Interactions With Large Displacements
• Moving mesh methods in multiple dimensions based on harmonic maps
• One-to-one piecewise linear mappings over triangulations
• Updating meshes on deforming domains: An application of the target‐matrix paradigm

This page was built for publication: A comparison of mesh morphing methods for \(3D\) shape optimization

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q7357170)