A comparison of two generalized response surface methods for optimisation in electromagnetics

DOI10.1108/03321640110393743MaRDI QIDQ2764759zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors K. Rashid, Maria Antonietta Farina, J. A. Ramirez, J. K. Sykulski, E. M. Freeman

Publication date 22 July 2002

Published in COMPEL (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1108/03321640110393743

zbMATH Keywords

electromagnetic designevolution strategiesfinite elementfuzzy systemsgeneralized response surface methodsneural networksoptimisation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

PDEs in connection with optics and electromagnetic theory (35Q60) Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs (65M60) Electromagnetic theory (general) (78A25) Finite element, Galerkin and related methods applied to problems in optics and electromagnetic theory (78M10) Optimization problems in optics and electromagnetic theory (78M50)

Recommendations

• Optimisation in electromagnetics with the space‐mapping technique
• Reducing computational effort in field optimisation problems
• A hybrid one‐then‐two stage algorithm for computationally expensive electromagnetic design optimization
• Recent experiences of multiobjective optimisation in electromagnetics
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4193039

Cites work

• The optimisation of electromagnetic devices using niching genetic algorithms

Cited in

(3)

• Recent experiences of multiobjective optimisation in electromagnetics
• Optimal method based on moving least square and particle swarm optimization
• Reducing computational effort in field optimisation problems

This page was built for publication: A comparison of two generalized response surface methods for optimisation in electromagnetics

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2764759)