A credulous semantics of higher-order argumentation frameworks based on credulously accepted attacks
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation
- A probabilistic deontic argumentation framework
- Abstract argumentation and the rational man
- AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
- Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
- Gödel semantics of fuzzy argumentation frameworks with consistency degrees
- Inductive defense for sceptical semantics of extended argumentation
- Law and logic: a review from an argumentation perspective
- Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- Probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks, a possible world view
- Proximity semantics for topic-based abstract argumentation
- Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
- Renovation sets and their applications in higher-order argumentation frameworks
- Semantics for higher level attacks in extended argumentation frames. I: Overview
- Valid attacks in argumentation frameworks with recursive attacks
- Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
This page was built for publication: A credulous semantics of higher-order argumentation frameworks based on credulously accepted attacks
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6909829)
