A dialectical formalisation of preferred subtheories reasoning under resource bounds
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- A general account of argumentation with preferences
- A general framework for sound assumption-based argumentation dialogues
- A logic for default reasoning
- An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
- Classical logic, argument and dialectic
- Coherence and Flexibility in Dialogue Games for Argumentation
- Extending dialectical classical logic argumentation with unrestricted rebut and Occam razor defeats
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4174344 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6934384 (Why is no real title available?)
- Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties
- Logic-based approaches to formal argumentation
- Logical argumentation by dynamic proof systems
- Normality, non-contamination and logical depth in classical natural deduction
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- On the equivalence of semantics for normal logic programs
- On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
- Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
- Semi-stable semantics
- The complexity of logic-based abduction
- Towards a general framework for dialogues that accommodate reasoning about preferences
- Translating preferred subtheories into structured argumentation
- Twenty-Five Years of Preferred Subtheories
This page was built for publication: A dialectical formalisation of preferred subtheories reasoning under resource bounds
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6976949)
