A formal statement of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument

DOI10.1007/BF00682560MaRDI QIDQ1254301zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors James H. McGrath

Publication date 1978

Published in International Journal of Theoretical Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

Formal AnalysisPhilosophical LogicQuantum Mechanics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Foundations, quantum information and its processing, quantum axioms, and philosophy (81P99)

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3136643 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3266514 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3076631 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3091656 (Why is no real title available?)
• Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
• Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?
• Further Considerations on Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory
• Is the Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Complete?
• Note on the Quantum-Mechanical Theory of Measurement
• ON THE NOTIONS OF CAUSALITY AND COMPLEMENTARITY¹
• The Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
• Two Deviant Logics for Quantum Theory: Bohr and Reichenbach

Cited in

(3)

• When champions meet: rethinking the Bohr-Einstein debate
• Einstein completeness as categoricity
• Bibliography on quantum logics and related structures

This page was built for publication: A formal statement of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1254301)