A note on model selection for small sample regression
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: The risk estimator called "Direct Eigenvalue Estimator" (DEE) is studied. DEE was developed for small sample regression. In contrast to many existing model selection criteria, derivation of DEE requires neither any asymptotic assumption nor any prior knowledge about the noise variance and the noise distribution. It was reported that DEE performed well in small sample cases but DEE performed a little worse than the state-of-the-art ADJ. This seems somewhat counter-intuitive because DEE was developed for specifically regression problem by exploiting available information exhaustively, while ADJ was developed for general setting. In this paper, we point out that the derivation of DEE includes an inappropriate part in spite that the resultant form of DEE is valid in a sense. As its result, DEE cannot derive its potential. We introduce a class of valid risk estimators based on the idea of DEE and show that better risk estimators (mDEE) can be found in the class. By numerical experiments, we verify that mDEE often performs better than or at least equally the original DEE and ADJ.
Recommendations
Cites work
- Estimating the dimension of a model
- Further analysis of the data by Akaike's information criterion and the finite corrections
- Generalised information criteria in model selection
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3444596 (Why is no real title available?)
- Matrix Analysis
- Model selection for small sample regression
- Statistical predictor identification
- The elements of statistical learning. Data mining, inference, and prediction
Cited in
(4)
This page was built for publication: A note on model selection for small sample regression
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q682390)