A simple proof of a theorem of Statman
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- A theory of prepositional types
- Completeness, invariance and λ-definability
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3561331 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3639144 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3993540 (Why is no real title available?)
- The complexity of theorem-proving procedures
- The polynomial-time hierarchy
- The typed lambda-calculus is not elementary recursive
Cited in
(16)- A simple proof of the majorizing measure theorem
- Parallel beta reduction is not elementary recursive
- (Optimal) duplication is not elementary recursive
- Statman's 1-section theorem
- Enumerators of lambda terms are reducing constructively
- On session types and polynomial time
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7227789 (Why is no real title available?)
- An alternate proof of Statman's finite completeness theorem
- Statman's hierarchy theorem
- An analysis of the Core-ML language: Expressive power and type reconstruction
- The complexity of type inference for higher-order typed lambda calculi
- The complexity of higher-order queries
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7561616 (Why is no real title available?)
- The most nonelementary theory
- Simply typed convertibility is \textsc{Tower}-complete even for safe lambda-terms
- Implicit automata in typed -calculi I: aperiodicity in a non-commutative logic
This page was built for publication: A simple proof of a theorem of Statman
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1199546)