A tame sequence of transitive Boolean functions
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: Given a sequence of Boolean functions , , and a sequence of continuous time -biased random walks on , let be the (random) number of times in at which the process changes its value. In cite{js2006}, the authors conjectured that if is non-degenerate, transitive and satisfies , then is not tight. We give an explicit example of a sequence of Boolean functions which disproves this conjecture.
Recommendations
- When are sequences of Boolean functions tame?
- Pivotality versus noise stability for monotone transitive functions
- Volatility of Boolean functions
- Denseness of volatile and nonvolatile sequences of functions
- Scaling limits for the threshold window: when does a monotone Boolean function flip its outcome?
Cites work
- Analysis of Boolean Functions
- Denseness of volatile and nonvolatile sequences of functions
- First-passage-time density and moments of the ornstein-uhlenbeck process
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3736679 (Why is no real title available?)
- MEAN VARIANCE AND SKEWNESS OF THE FIRST PASSAGE TIME FOR THE ORNSTEIN-UHLENBECK PROCESS
- Noise sensitivity of Boolean functions and applications to percolation
- Noise Sensitivity of Boolean Functions and Percolation
- Noise stability of functions with low influences: invariance and optimality
- Pivotality versus noise stability for monotone transitive functions
- The influence of variables in product spaces
- Volatility of Boolean functions
Cited in
(2)
This page was built for publication: A tame sequence of transitive Boolean functions
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2064889)