Accuracy of proportion estimators: A simple rule

DOI10.1007/BF02613696MaRDI QIDQ1312211zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Eugene F. Schuster

Publication date 12 April 1994

Published in Metrika (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://eudml.org/doc/176479

zbMATH Keywords

confidence intervalfinite populationsample surveyaccuracy rulebinomial model of random sampling with replacementestimating proportionhypergeometric model of simple random sampling without replacement

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Sampling theory, sample surveys (62D05) Parametric tolerance and confidence regions (62F25)

Recommendations

• Revisiting proportion estimators
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7280233
• Confidence intervals with fixed proportional accuracy
• Ratio estimators in simple random sampling
• Mean estimation through proportion estimation
• Sample size and the accuracy of a consistent estimator
• Optimum ratio estimators for the population proportion
• Estimating Population Proportions by Means of Calibration Estimators

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3458034 (Why is no real title available?)
• The Accuracy of Probability Estimates
• Vergleich der hypergeometrischen mit der Binomial-Verteilung

Cited in

(3)

• Cochran's Rule for Simple Random Sampling
• The shortest confidence interval for proportion in finite populations
• On uncertainty of a proportion from a stratified random sample of a small population

This page was built for publication: Accuracy of proportion estimators: A simple rule

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1312211)