Achieving fair treatment in algorithmic classification
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
Cited in
(18)- Tackling algorithmic bias in neural-network classifiers using Wasserstein-2 regularization
- Matching code and law: achieving algorithmic fairness with optimal transport
- How do fairness definitions fare? Testing public attitudes towards three algorithmic definitions of fairness in loan allocations
- Indistinguishable predictions and multi-group fair learning
- Model-based and actual independence for fairness-aware classification
- Inherent tradeoffs in learning fair representations
- Gerrymandering individual fairness
- Fairness through awareness
- Making individually fair predictions with causal pathways
- Making clusterings fairer by post-processing: algorithms, complexity results and experiments
- FairDEA -- removing disparate impact from efficiency scores
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7064055 (Why is no real title available?)
- Generalizing group fairness in machine learning via utilities
- An algorithm for removing sensitive information: application to race-independent recidivism prediction
- Achieving fairness with a simple ridge penalty
- Certifying the fairness of KNN in the presence of dataset bias
- Monitoring algorithmic fairness
- Algorithms as discrimination detectors
This page was built for publication: Achieving fair treatment in algorithmic classification
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1629438)
