Against truthmaker necessitarianism

DOI10.2143/LEA.233.0.3149530MaRDI QIDQ5283806zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Robin Stenwall

Publication date 25 July 2017

Full work available at URL https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/5337054

zbMATH Keywords

Armstrongexplanationnecessitytruthmaking

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Recommendations

• Truthmaking without necessitation
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5001189
• Truthmakers and necessary connections
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1749142
• Troubles with truth-making: Necessitation and projection

Cited in

(24)

• Truthmakers, moral responsibility, and an alleged counterexample to rule A
• Against grounding necessitarianism
• Physicalism, truthmaking, and levels of reality: prospects and problems
• Troubles with truth-making: Necessitation and projection
• Truthmaking without necessitation
• Truthmaking and the is-ought gap
• Truthmaking and fundamentality
• An argument against Aristotelian universals
• Fundamental truthmakers and non-fundamental truths
• Necessary truth and proof
• In defence of an argument against truthmaker maximalism
• Making quantified truths true
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5001189 (Why is no real title available?)
• Truthmakers: a tale of two explanatory projects
• Truth-making without truth-makers
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1749142 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2170949 (Why is no real title available?)
• Mumford and Anjum on causal necessitarianism and antecedent strengthening
• The logical structure of truthmaking
• Grounding grounds necessity
• Undermining truthmaker theory
• Logic and/of truthmaking
• A short argument for truthmaker maximalism
• Truthmakers and necessary connections

This page was built for publication: Against truthmaker necessitarianism

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5283806)