An argument against the realistic interpretation of the wave function
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: Testable predictions of quantum mechanics are invariant under time reversal. But the change of the quantum state in time is not so, neither in the collapse nor in the no-collapse interpretations of the theory. This fact challenges the realistic interpretation of the quantum state. On the other hand, this fact follows easily if we interpret the quantum state as a mere calculation device, bookkeeping past real quantum events. The same conclusion follows from the analysis of the meaning of the wave function in the semiclassical regime.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5702692 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5764997 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 936290 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3208040 (Why is no real title available?)
- Bohmian mechanics and quantum information
- Relational EPR
- Relational quantum mechanics
- Rovelli's world
- The wave function. Essays on the metaphysics of quantum mechanics
- Time reversal symmetry and collapse models
Cited in
(15)- An alternative foundation of quantum theory
- A quintet of quandaries: five No-Go theorems for relational quantum mechanics
- A general argument against the universal validity of the superposition principle
- Are quantum spins but small perturbations of ontological Ising spins?
- On the character of quantum law: Complementarity, entanglement, and information
- Neither presentism nor eternalism
- Quantum relational indeterminacy
- Fact-nets: towards a mathematical framework for relational quantum mechanics
- Relational quantum mechanics and the PBR theorem: a peaceful coexistence
- The bundle theory approach to relational quantum mechanics
- Appearance of thermal time
- The relational dissolution of the quantum measurement problems
- Markovian and non-Markovian quantum measurements
- Cellular automaton ontology, bits, qubits and the Dirac equation
- Can the two-time interpretation of quantum mechanics solve the measurement problem?
This page was built for publication: An argument against the realistic interpretation of the wave function
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2360327)