Assessing post-data weight of evidence

DOI10.1016/J.JSPI.2005.03.002MaRDI QIDQ2500651zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Chen-Hai Andy Tsao

Publication date 17 August 2006

Published in Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2005.03.002

zbMATH Keywords

\(p\)-valuesBayes estimatesBayes-classical conflictconjugate priorsrobust Bayesian analysis

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Bayesian inference (62F15) Robustness and adaptive procedures (parametric inference) (62F35)

Recommendations

• Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 850149
• The agreement between the generalized \(p\) value and Bayesian evidence in the one-sided testing problem
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 571961
• p-values as expert votes

Cites work

• A note on Lindley's paradox
• Comparison of the p-value and posterior probability
• Estimation of accuracy in testing
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3844820 (Why is no real title available?)
• Reconciling Bayesian and Frequentist Evidence in the One-Sided Testing Problem
• Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence
• Testing precise hypotheses. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors

Cited in

(8)

• A note on Lindley's paradox
• p-values as expert votes
• Bayesian approach to estimation of accuracy in two-sided testing
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 571961 (Why is no real title available?)
• Weighing evidence in decision systems
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 850149 (Why is no real title available?)
• Power estimation for testing normal means
• Test martingales, Bayes factors and \(p\)-values

This page was built for publication: Assessing post-data weight of evidence

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2500651)