Assessing the quality of negotiated proposals using the REMBRANDT system

DOI10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00372-5MaRDI QIDQ1579472zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Robin C. van den Honert, Freerk A. Lootsma

Publication date 18 February 2002

Published in European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(98)00372-5

zbMATH Keywords

acceptability scoresaggregationmultiple issue conflictsnegotiationspairwise comparisonsreference levelsREMBRANDT system

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Cites work

• Comparison of REMBRANDT system with analytic hierarchy process
• Consistent weights for judgements matrices on the relative importance of alternatives
• Fuzzy logic for planning and decision making
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3679573 (Why is no real title available?)
• Power Relations and Group Aggregation in the Multiplicative AHP and SMART
• Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
• Scale sensitivity in the multiplicative AHP and SMART

Cited in

(4)

• Recommending multiple criteria decision analysis methods with a new taxonomy-based decision support system
• Systemic decision making in AHP: a Bayesian approach
• Further analysis on matrix operation of AHP
• An MCDA approach for the selection of bike projects based on structuring and appraising activities

This page was built for publication: Assessing the quality of negotiated proposals using the REMBRANDT system

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1579472)