Benchmarking physics-informed frameworks for data-driven hyperelasticity
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: Data-driven methods have changed the way we understand and model materials. However, while providing unmatched flexibility, these methods have limitations such as reduced capacity to extrapolate, overfitting, and violation of physics constraints. Recent developments have led to modeling frameworks that automatically satisfy these requirements. Here we review, extend, and compare three promising data-driven methods: Constitutive Artificial Neural Networks (CANN), Input Convex Neural Networks (ICNN), and Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (NODE). Our formulation expands the strain energy potentials in terms of sums of convex non-decreasing functions of invariants and linear combinations of these. The expansion of the energy is shared across all three methods and guarantees the automatic satisfaction of objectivity and polyconvexity, essential within the context of hyperelasticity. To benchmark the methods, we train them against rubber and skin stress-strain data. All three approaches capture the data almost perfectly, without overfitting, and have some capacity to extrapolate. Interestingly, the methods find different energy functions even though the prediction on the stress data is nearly identical. The most notable differences are observed in the second derivatives, which could impact performance of numerical solvers. On the rich set of data used in these benchmarks, the models show the anticipated trade-off between number of parameters and accuracy. Overall, CANN, ICNN and NODE retain the flexibility and accuracy of other data-driven methods without compromising on the physics. These methods are thus ideal options to model arbitrary hyperelastic material behavior.
Recommendations
- Data-driven tissue mechanics with polyconvex neural ordinary differential equations
- Data-driven methods for computational mechanics: a fair comparison between neural networks based and model-free approaches
- A mechanics‐informed artificial neural network approach in data‐driven constitutive modeling
- Data-driven nonparametric identification of material behavior based on physics-informed neural network with full-field data
Cited in
(12)- Data-driven nonparametric identification of material behavior based on physics-informed neural network with full-field data
- Automated model discovery for human cardiac tissue: discovering the best model and parameters
- On sparse regression, \(L_p\)-regularization, and automated model discovery
- Versatile data-adaptive hyperelastic energy functions for soft materials
- Data-driven methods for computational mechanics: a fair comparison between neural networks based and model-free approaches
- Machine-learning-based virtual fields method: application to anisotropic hyperelasticity
- Discovering uncertainty: Gaussian constitutive neural networks with correlated weights
- Democratizing biomedical simulation through automated model discovery and a universal material subroutine
- On the use of physics-based constraints and validation KPI for data-driven elastoplastic constitutive modelling
- Neural networks meet anisotropic hyperelasticity: a framework based on generalized structure tensors and isotropic tensor functions
- Automated model discovery of finite strain elastoplasticity from uniaxial experiments
- Heterogeneous peridynamic neural operators: discover biotissue constitutive law and microstructure from digital image correlation measurements
This page was built for publication: Benchmarking physics-informed frameworks for data-driven hyperelasticity
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6129304)
