Bounds for the accuracy of invalid normal approximation
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: In applied probability, the normal approximation is often used for the distribution of data with assumed additive structure. This tradition is based on the central limit theorem for sums of (independent) random variables. However, it is practically impossible to check the conditions providing the validity of the central limit theorem when the observed sample size is limited. Therefore it is very important to know what the real accuracy of the normal approximation is in the cases where it is used despite it is theoretically inapplicable. Moreover, in some situations related with computer simulation, if the distributions of separate summands in the sum belong to the domain of attraction of a stable law with characteristic exponent less than two, then the observed distance between the distribution of the normalized sum and the normal law first decreases as the number of summands grows and begins to increase only when the number of summands becomes large enough. In the present paper an attempt is undertaken to give some theoretical explanation to this effect.
Recommendations
Cites work
- An improvement of the Berry-Esseen inequality with applications to Poisson and mixed Poisson random sums
- Bounds of the accuracy of the normal approximation to the distributions of random sums under relaxed moment conditions
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3495428 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3452922 (Why is no real title available?)
- Inequalities for the $r$th Absolute Moment of a Sum of Random Variables, $1 \leqq r \leqq 2$
- On the absolute constants in the Berry-Esseen-type inequalities
- Pre-limit theorems and their applications
This page was built for publication: Bounds for the accuracy of invalid normal approximation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5090257)