Categorical generalization and physical structuralism
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: Category theory has become central to certain aspects of theoretical physics. Bain [Synthese, 190:1621--1635 (2013)] has recently argued that this has significance for ontic structural realism. We argue against this claim. In so doing, we uncover two pervasive forms of category-theoretic generalization. We call these `generalization by duality' and `generalization by categorifying physical processes'. We describe in detail how these arise, and explain their significance using detailed examples. We show that their significance is two-fold: the articulation of high-level physical concepts, and the generation of new models.
Recommendations
Cited in
(10)- Category theory and physical structuralism
- Duality as a category-theoretic concept
- Category-theoretic structure and radical ontic structural realism
- No categorial support for radical ontic structural realism
- Why categories?
- Are there category-theoretical explanations of physical phenomena?
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 589690 (Why is no real title available?)
- Why not categorical equivalence?
- Quasi-structural realism
- An electrical engineering perspective on naturality in computational physics
This page was built for publication: Categorical generalization and physical structuralism
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4554982)