Classical logic without bivalence
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cited in
(27)- Entailment and bivalence
- Normality, non-contamination and logical depth in classical natural deduction
- Failure of completeness in proof-theoretic semantics
- Classical logic is not uniquely characterizable
- An expressivist bilateral meaning-is-use analysis of classical propositional logic
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4132129 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 30929 (Why is no real title available?)
- Bilateralist detours: from intuitionist to classical logic and back
- On Dummett's verificationist justification procedure
- On an inferential semantics for classical logic
- Hypothesis-discharging rules in atomic bases
- Definite Formulae, Negation-as-Failure, and the Base-Extension Semantics of Intuitionistic Propositional Logic
- Bilateral Rules as Complex Rules
- Proof-theoretic semantics for intuitionistic multiplicative linear logic
- A Pragmatic-Semiotic Defence of Bivalence
- On Dummett's pragmatist justification procedure
- Inferentialist resource semantics
- A sequent calculus perspective on base-extension semantics
- Base-extension semantics for S5 modal logic
- Base-extension semantics for modal logic
- On an inferential semantics for intuitionistic sentential logic
- Proof-theoretic semantics for first-order logic
- Proof-theoretic semantics for intuitionistic multiplicative linear logic
- Classical logic, uniformity, and weak excluded middle in non-monotonic proof-theoretic semantics
- From proof-theoretic validity to base-extension semantics for intuitionistic propositional logic
- A proof-theoretic approach to the semantics of classical linear logic
- Rethinking bivalence
This page was built for publication: Classical logic without bivalence
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4648470)