Cohen Forcing and Inner Models

DOI10.1002/MALQ.201800062MaRDI QIDQ6307336arXivFDO

Authors Jonas Reitz

Publication date 26 September 2018

Published in arXiv

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1002/MALQ.201800062

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Consistency and independence results (03E35) Other aspects of forcing and Boolean-valued models (03E40) Inner models, including constructibility, ordinal definability, and core models (03E45)

arXiv classification

math.LO

Abstract: Given an inner model $WsubsetV$ and a regular cardinal $kappa$, we consider two alternatives for adding a subset to $kappa$ by forcing: the Cohen poset $Add(kappa,1)$, and the Cohen poset of the inner model $Add(kappa,1{)}^W$. The forcing from $W$ will be at least as strong as the forcing from $V$ (in the sense that forcing with the former adds a generic for the latter) if and only if the two posets have the same cardinality. On the other hand, a sufficient condition is established for the poset from $V$ to fail to be as strong as that from $W$. The results are generalized to $Add(kappa,lambda)$, and to iterations of Cohen forcing where the poset at each stage comes from an arbitrary intermediate inner model.

This page was built for publication: Cohen Forcing and Inner Models

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6307336)