Combining randomized and non-randomized evidence in network meta-analysis
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- Adjusted likelihoods for synthesizing empirical evidence from studies that differ in quality and design: effects of environmental tobacco smoke
- An approach for modelling multiple correlated outcomes in a network of interventions using odds ratios
- Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons
- Bayesian methods in meta-analysis and evidence synthesis
- Hierarchical network meta-analysis models to address sparsity of events and differing treatment classifications with regard to adverse outcomes
- Incorporating data from various trial designs into a mixed treatment comparison model
- Multiple-Bias Modelling for Analysis of Observational Data
- Network meta-analysis models to account for variability in treatment definitions: application to dose effects
- Planning future studies based on the precision of network meta-analysis results
- Robust meta‐analytic‐predictive priors in clinical trials with historical control information
- The power prior: theory and applications
This page was built for publication: Combining randomized and non-randomized evidence in network meta-analysis
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q7002222)
