Comment: The need for syncretism in applied statistics
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: Comment on "The Need for Syncretism in Applied Statistics" [arXiv:1012.1161]
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3915394 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3934086 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3597760 (Why is no real title available?)
- A New Perspective on Priors for Generalized Linear Models
- Applying quantitative bias analysis to epidemiologic data
- Bayesianly justifiable and relevant frequency calculations for the applied statistician
- Bayesians, Frequentists, and Scientists
- False Models and Post-Data Model Construction
- Interval estimation for messy observational data
- Multiple-Bias Modelling for Analysis of Observational Data
- On model expansion, model contraction, identifiability and prior information: two illustrative scenarios involving mismeasured variables
- On the consistency of Bayes estimates
- Relaxation penalties and priors for plausible modeling of nonidentified bias sources
- Sampling and Bayes' Inference in Scientific Modelling and Robustness
- Stein's Estimation Rule and Its Competitors--An Empirical Bayes Approach
- The Efficiency of Logistic Regression Compared to Normal Discriminant Analysis
- The Performance of Random Coefficient Regression in Accounting for Residual Confounding
- Toward a Reconciliation of the Bayesian and Frequentist Approaches to Point Estimation
- When Should Epidemiologic Regressions Use Random Coefficients?
This page was built for publication: Comment: The need for syncretism in applied statistics
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q903284)
