Communication strength of correlations violating monogamy relations
From MaRDI portal
General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations (81P15) Quantum coherence, entanglement, quantum correlations (81P40) Quantum information, communication, networks (quantum-theoretic aspects) (81P45) Channel models (including quantum) in information and communication theory (94A40)
Abstract: In any theory satisfying the no-signaling principle correlations generated among spatially separated parties in a Bell-type experiment are subject to certain constraints known as monogamy relations. Recently, in the context of the black hole information loss problem it was suggested that these monogamy relations might be violated. This in turn implies that correlations arising in such a scenario must violate the no-signaling principle and hence can be used to send classical information between parties. Here, we study the amount of information that can be sent using such correlations. To this aim, we first provide a framework associating them with classical channels whose capacities are then used to quantify the usefulness of these correlations in sending information. Finally, we determine the minimal amount of information that can be sent using signaling correlations violating the monogamy relation associated to the chained Bell inequalities.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 727573 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3062467 (Why is no real title available?)
- A glance beyond the quantum model
- Amplifying the Randomness of Weak Sources Correlated With Devices
- Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?
- Monogamy of non-local quantum correlations
- Proposed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories
- Wringing out better Bell inequalities
This page was built for publication: Communication strength of correlations violating monogamy relations
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q284465)