Compactifying the state space for alternative theories of gravity
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: In this paper we address important issues surrounding the choice of variables when performing a dynamical systems analysis of alternative theories of gravity. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of compactifying the state space, and illustrate this using two examples. We first show how to define a compact state space for the class of LRS Bianchi type I models in -gravity and compare to a non--compact expansion--normalised approach. In the second example we consider the flat Friedmann matter subspace of the previous example, and compare the compact analysis to studies where non-compact non--expansion--normalised variables were used. In both examples we comment on the existence of bouncing or recollapsing orbits as well as the existence of static models.
Recommendations
Cited in
(10)- Homogeneous cosmologies in generalized modified gravity
- Oscillatory behaviour of closed isotropic models in second order gravity theory
- Dynamical systems applied to cosmology: dark energy and modified gravity
- Dynamics of Hu-Sawicki model in Born-Infeld \(f(R)\) gravity theory
- \(f(R)\) theories of gravity
- Qualitative study of Lyra cosmologies with spatial curvature
- Qualitative study of anisotropic cosmologies with inhomogeneous equation of state
- Varying vacuum models with spatial curvature: a dynamical system perspective
- The interacting vacuum energy models with spatial curvature: a dynamical system perspective with observational constraints
- Dynamical systems analysis of f(r, L_m) gravity model
This page was built for publication: Compactifying the state space for alternative theories of gravity
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5445256)