Comparative Study of Finite Element Methods Using the Time-Accuracy-Size(TAS) Spectrum Analysis
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: We present a performance analysis appropriate for comparing algorithms using different numerical discretizations. By taking into account the total time-to-solution, numerical accuracy with respect to an error norm, and the computation rate, a cost-benefit analysis can be performed to determine which algorithm and discretization are particularly suited for an application. This work extends the performance spectrum model in Chang et. al. 2017 for interpretation of hardware and algorithmic tradeoffs in numerical PDE simulation. As a proof-of-concept, popular finite element software packages are used to illustrate this analysis for Poisson's equation.
Recommendations
- On the accuracy of the finite element method plus time relaxation
- A computational comparison between isogeometric analysis and spectral element methods: accuracy and spectral properties
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1062850
- The spectral-element and pseudo-spectral methods: a comparative study
- On the efficiency and accuracy of the boundary element method and the finite element method
- A numerical comparison of finite element methods for the Helmholtz equation
- Accuracy of a class of concurrent algorithms for transient finite element analysis
- Accuracy in finite element computation for eigenfrequencies
- Comparison of computational times and accuracy for finite element solution of Navier–Stokes equations and Ladyzhenskaya equations
- Energy-based comparison between the Fourier-Galerkin method and the finite element method
Cites work
- A parallel edge orientation algorithm for quadrilateral meshes
- A scalable variational inequality approach for flow through porous media models with pressure-dependent viscosity
- Achieving textbook multigrid efficiency for hydrostatic ice sheet flow
- An explicit expression for the penalty parameter of the interior penalty method
- Automated generation and symbolic manipulation of tensor product finite elements
- Efficient mesh management in firedrake using PETSc DMPlex
- Evaluation of three unstructured multigrid methods on 3D finite element problems in solid mechanics
- Firedrake, automating the finite element method by composing abstractions
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3564235 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1744773 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2088244 (Why is no real title available?)
- Large-scale optimization-based non-negative computational framework for diffusion equations: parallel implementation and performance studies
- Mechanics-based solution verification for porous media models
- On orienting edges of unstructured two- and three-dimensional meshes
- The \texttt{deal.II} library, version 8.4
- To CG or to HDG: A comparative study
- Unified Analysis of Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Elliptic Problems
- Unified Hybridization of Discontinuous Galerkin, Mixed, and Continuous Galerkin Methods for Second Order Elliptic Problems
- Variational inequality approach to enforcing the non-negative constraint for advection-diffusion equations
Cited in
(6)- A segregated approach for modeling the electrochemistry in the 3-D microstructure of li-ion batteries and its acceleration using block preconditioners
- Composable block solvers for the four-field double porosity/permeability model
- The discontinuous Galerkin method: derivation and properties
- High-performance implementation of discontinuous Galerkin methods with application in fluid flow
- A GPU-accelerated hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin method for linear elasticity
- Stencil composition for finite difference approximations of partial differential equations
Describes a project that uses
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: Comparative Study of Finite Element Methods Using the Time-Accuracy-Size(TAS) Spectrum Analysis
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4562332)
