Comparative evaluation of six different numerical integration methods for non-linear dynamic systems

DOI10.1016/0022-460X(88)90298-2MaRDI QIDQ3224389zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Charles W. Bert, J. D. Stricklin

Publication date 2 April 2012

Published in Journal of Sound and Vibration (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460x(88)90298-2

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Numerical integration (65D30)

Recommendations

• Postintegration methods for numerical integration of non‐linear dynamic equations of motion
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3862638
• Non-standard, explicit integration algorithms based on linearization for nonlinear dynamic response analysis
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 124630
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1014993

Cited in

(6)

• The accuracy of the generalized-\(\alpha\) method in the time integration of nonlinear single- and two-DOF forced systems
• On practical integration of semi-discretized nonlinear equations of motion. I: Reasons for probable instability and improper convergence
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3862638 (Why is no real title available?)
• Postintegration methods for numerical integration of non‐linear dynamic equations of motion
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 124630 (Why is no real title available?)
• Non-standard, explicit integration algorithms based on linearization for nonlinear dynamic response analysis

This page was built for publication: Comparative evaluation of six different numerical integration methods for non-linear dynamic systems

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3224389)