Comparing MTI randomization procedures to blocked randomization

DOI10.1002/SIM.6637MaRDI QIDQ6965003zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Vance W. Berger, Klejda Bejleri, Rebecca Agnor

Publication date 4 July 2025

Published in Statistics in Medicine (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1002/SIM.6637

zbMATH Keywords

inertiamaximal procedureMTI procedurespermuted blocksrandomization

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10)

Cites work

• A better alternative to stratified permuted block design for subject randomization in clinical trials
• Biased coin design with imbalance tolerance
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3841097 (Why is no real title available?)
• Some Restricted randomization rules in sequential designs

Cited in

(6)

• Delayed unmasking and selection bias
• On the limitations of permuted blocked randomization
• A better alternative to the inferior permuted block design is not necessarily complex
• Assessing the impact of selection bias on test decisions in trials with a time-to-event outcome
• A comparative study of restricted randomization procedures for multiarm trials with equal or unequal treatment allocation ratios
• Allocation predictability of individual assignments in restricted randomization designs for two-arm equal allocation trials

This page was built for publication: Comparing MTI randomization procedures to blocked randomization

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6965003)