Comparison of different implementation algorithms for HiSS constitutive models in FEM

DOI10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00273-XMaRDI QIDQ1302401zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors V. Pereyra

Publication date 26 November 2000

Published in International Journal of Solids and Structures (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

modified Euler methoddisplacement controlled rigid footingelastic predictor-plastic corrector methodhierarchical single surface modelimplicit integration methodload controlled flexible footingplastic predictor-plastic corrector method

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics (74S05) Small-strain, rate-independent theories of plasticity (including rigid-plastic and elasto-plastic materials) (74C05)

Recommendations

• Consistent numerical implementation of hypoelastic constitutive models
• A comparison of mapping algorithms for hierarchical adaptive FEM in finite elasto-plasticity
• Effective constitutive algorithms in elastoplasticity and elastoviscoplasticity
• A comparison of computational complexities of HFEM and ABC based infinite element methods
• Fast algorithms for setting up the stiffness matrix in \(hp\)-FEM: a comparison
• Comparison of different FETI preconditioners for elastoplasticity
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1535962
• Comparison of finite element methods for the diffusion problem
• Finite element implementation of a certain class of elasto-viscoplastic constitutive models
• Comparison results of finite element methods for the Poisson model problem

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• ABAQUS

This page was built for publication: Comparison of different implementation algorithms for HiSS constitutive models in FEM

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1302401)