Comparisons of several graphical methods for representing multivariate data
From MaRDI portal
Graphical displays provide a powerful tool for presenting and studying many types of data. This article presents an evaluation of several special graphical methods for representing multivariate data, including three face-type methods and a function-plot method. The evaluation utilizes a split-plot-factorial experimental design. Under the conditions of this experiment, the modified Chernoff-face data-representation method is clearly superior.
Recommendations
Cites work
Cited in
(17)- Graphical data analysis in comparative experimental studies
- Graphical prediction method based on categorical data
- Graphical comparisons of multivariate data
- Exploring multivariate grouped data in S
- Towards better graphics for multivariate analysis: the interactive factor map
- Comparison of Chernoff-type face and non-graphical methods for clustering multivariate observations
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4018092 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3870384 (Why is no real title available?)
- Analysing Your Multivariate Data as a Pictorial: A Case for Applying Biplot Methodology?
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1346769 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1489815 (Why is no real title available?)
- Modern Quantification Theory
- A diamond-shaped equiponderant graphical display of the effects of two categorical predictors on continuous outcomes
- A technique for comparing graphical methods
- Polyhedron graphs for displaying multivariate data
- Andrews plots for multivariate data: Some new suggestions and applications
- Graphical Comparison of High‐Dimensional Distributions
This page was built for publication: Comparisons of several graphical methods for representing multivariate data
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q579782)