Complexity of Steiner tree in split graphs -- dichotomy results

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: Given a connected graph G and a terminal set RsubseteqV(G), {em Steiner tree} asks for a tree that includes all of R with at most r edges for some integer rgeq0. It is known from [ND12,Garey et. al cite{steinernpc}] that Steiner tree is NP-complete in general graphs. {em Split graph} is a graph which can be partitioned into a clique and an independent set. K. White et. al cite{white} has established that Steiner tree in split graphs is NP-complete. In this paper, we present an interesting dichotomy: we show that Steiner tree on K1,4-free split graphs is polynomial-time solvable, whereas, Steiner tree on K1,5-free split graphs is NP-complete. We investigate K1,4-free and K1,3-free (also known as claw-free) split graphs from a structural perspective. Further, using our structural study, we present polynomial-time algorithms for Steiner tree in K1,4-free and K1,3-free split graphs. Although, polynomial-time solvability of K1,3-free split graphs is implied from K1,4-free split graphs, we wish to highlight our structural observations on K1,3-free split graphs which may be used in other combinatorial problems.












This page was built for publication: Complexity of Steiner tree in split graphs -- dichotomy results

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2795958)