Compromising as an equal loss principle
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- Compromise in combinatorial vote
- For claims problems, another compromise between the proportional and constrained equal awards rules
- A comparison of theoretical and empirical evaluations of the Borda compromise
- Assessing the level of compromise in real choice models
- On a compromise social choice correspondence
Cites work
- A characterization of the maximin rule in the context of voting
- A solution to the two-person implementation problem
- An axiomatization of the Kalai-Smorodinsky solution when the feasible sets can be finite
- Bargaining over a finite set of alternatives
- Control complexity in Bucklin and fallback voting: a theoretical analysis
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3864918 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1414348 (Why is no real title available?)
- Intermediate preferences and Rawlsian arbitration rules
- Nash bargaining theory when the number of alternatives can be finite
- The bargaining problem
- The equal-loss principle for bargaining problems
- The lexicographic equal-loss solution
- The majoritarian compromise is majoritarian-optimal and subgame-perfect implementable
- The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problems.
- Undominated strategies and coordination in normalform games
- Virtual Implementation in Nash Equilibrium
Cited in
(6)
This page was built for publication: Compromising as an equal loss principle
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6172228)
