Consistency of common spatial estimators under spatial confounding
From MaRDI portal
Cites work
- A flexible approach to inference in semiparametric regression models with correlated errors using Gaussian processes
- A spectral adjustment for spatial confounding
- Adding spatially-correlated errors can mess up the fixed effect you love
- Alleviating spatial confounding for areal data problems by displacing the geographical centroids
- Convergence rates for partially splined models
- Dimension Reduction and Alleviation of Confounding for Spatial Generalized Linear Mixed Models
- Disease mapping and spatial regression with count data
- Effects of Residual Smoothing on the Posterior of the Fixed Effects in Disease‐Mapping Models
- Estimation and Prediction in the Presence of Spatial Confounding for Spatial Linear Models
- Mitigating spatial confounding by explicitly correlating Gaussian random fields
- Mitigating unobserved spatial confounding when estimating the effect of supermarket access on cardiovascular disease deaths
- On Deconfounding Spatial Confounding in Linear Models
- On Prediction Properties of Kriging: Uniform Error Bounds and Robustness
- On the Effects of Spatial Confounding in Hierarchical Models
- Restricted spatial regression in practice: geostatistical models, confounding, and robustness under model misspecification
- Restricted Spatial Regression Methods: Implications for Inference
- Selecting a scale for spatial confounding adjustment
- Spatial+: A novel approach to spatial confounding
- Structural Equation Models for Dealing With Spatial Confounding
- The importance of scale for spatial-confounding bias and precision of spatial regression estimators
Cited in
(2)
This page was built for publication: Consistency of common spatial estimators under spatial confounding
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6915793)
