Convergence of set-based multi-objective optimization, indicators and deteriorative cycles
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- Performance indicators in multiobjective optimization
- Convergence of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms to a uniformly distributed representation of the Pareto front
- On the convergence of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms
- Convergence of stochastic search algorithms to finite size Pareto set approximations
- Theoretical aspects of evolutionary multiobjective optimization
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 819814 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5686753 (Why is no real title available?)
- Approximating the volume of unions and intersections of high-dimensional geometric objects
- Bioinspired computation in combinatorial optimization. Algorithms and their computational complexity
- Convergence of stochastic search algorithms to finite size Pareto set approximations
- Monotonicity versus performance in co-optimization
- Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms
- On the convergence of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms
- Plateaus can be harder in multi-objective optimization
- SMS-EMOA: multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume
- Tight bounds for the approximation ratio of the hypervolume indicator
Cited in
(4)- Population size matters: rigorous runtime results for maximizing the hypervolume indicator
- A note on the \(\epsilon\)-indicator subset selection
- Runtime analysis of a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for obtaining finite approximations of Pareto fronts
- Design optimization using multiple dominance relations
This page was built for publication: Convergence of set-based multi-objective optimization, indicators and deteriorative cycles
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q714857)