Counterexample to iterative learning control of linear discrete-time multivariable systems
It is a very interesting example of a rare recent scientific discussion. In IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 38, No. 1, 121-125 (1993; Zbl 0773.93019), \textit{J. E. Kurek} and \textit{L. Zaremba} developed the so-called extended iterative learning control (EILC) algorithm for discrete systems based on a 2D approach. In Automatica 34, No. 11, 1459-1462 (1998), \textit{Y. Fang} and \textit{T. W. S. Chow} modified this approach claiming also that the EILC fails in guaranteeing convergence. In this note, the author shows that this modification can fail for uncertain systems and proves that convergence of the EILC is guaranteed. In turn, Fang and Chow try in their reply (p. 329) to defend their approach.
- Convergence and robustness of discrete time nonlinear systems with iterative learning control
- Comments on ``Robust optimal design and convergence properties analysis of iterative learning control approaches and ``On the P-type and Newton-type ILC schemes for dynamic systems with non-affine input factors
- Iterative learning control method for discrete-time dynamic systems
- Iterative learning control for generalized regular linear discrete-time systems
- A design of parameter optimal iterative learning control for linear discrete-time systems
This page was built for publication: Counterexample to iterative learning control of linear discrete-time multivariable systems
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1962016)