Counterexamples for IFS-attractors

DOI10.1016/J.CHAOS.2015.12.006MaRDI QIDQ528408zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Magdalena Nowak, M. Fernández-Martínez

Publication date 12 May 2017

Published in Chaos, Solitons and Fractals (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.03391

zbMATH Keywords

contractioniterated function systemfractalself-similar setBanach fractaltopological fractal

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Fractals (28A80) Connected and locally connected spaces (general aspects) (54D05) Dimension theory in general topology (54F45) Topological spaces of dimension (leq 1); curves, dendrites (54F50)

Abstract: In this paper, we deal with the part of Fractal Theory related to finite families of (weak) contractions, called iterated function systems (IFS, herein). An attractor is a compact set which remains invariant for such a family. Thus, we consider spaces homeomorphic to attractors of either IFS or weak IFS, as well, which we will refer to as Banach and topological fractals, respectively. We present a collection of counterexamples in order to show that all the presented definitions are essential, though they are not equivalent in general.

Recommendations

• Attractors for iterated function systems
• IFS attractors and Cantor sets
• The existence of the attractor of countable iterated function systems
• Generalized IFSs on noncompact spaces
• On a family of IFSs whose attractors are not connected

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 194082 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3585754 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3794378 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 918596 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3106043 (Why is no real title available?)
• A 1-dimensional Peano continuum which is not an IFS attractor
• A characterization of self-similar symbolic spaces
• A class of continua that are not attractors of any IFS
• A topological version of iterated function systems
• Attractors of topological iterated function system
• Contractive function systems, their attractors and metrization
• Controlled Hahn--Mazurkiewicz Theorem and some new dimension functions of Peano continua
• Detecting topological and Banach fractals among zero-dimensional spaces
• Fractal dimension for fractal structures
• Fractal dimension for fractal structures: A Hausdorff approach
• On Fixed and Periodic Points Under Contractive Mappings
• The shark teeth is a topological IFS-attractor
• Topological classification of scattered IFS-attractors

Cited in

(16)

• Split square and split carpet as examples of non-metrizable IFS attractors
• IFS attractors and Cantor sets
• On a typical compact set as the attractor of generalized iterated function systems of infinite order
• Topological classification of scattered IFS-attractors
• Size of the set of attractors for iterated function systems
• Construction of an Iterated Function System on ℝ ² whose Attractor is a QR Code
• Space-filling curves and geodesic laminations. II: Symmetries
• Borel complexity of the family of attractors for weak IFSs
• On a family of IFSs whose attractors are not connected
• Porosities of the sets of attractors
• BASIC TOPOLOGICAL STRUCTURE OF FAST BASINS
• Examples of minimal set for IFSs
• A class of continua that are not attractors of any IFS
• Comparison of the sets of attractors for systems of contractions and weak contractions
• Weakly contractive iterated function systems and beyond: a manual
• Peano continua with self regenerating fractals

This page was built for publication: Counterexamples for IFS-attractors

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q528408)