Cycle lengths in randomly perturbed graphs

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: Let G be an n-vertex graph, where delta(G)geqdeltan for some delta:=delta(n). A result of Bohman, Frieze and Martin from 2003 asserts that if alpha(G)=Oleft(delta2night), then perturbing G via the addition of omegaleft(fraclog(1/delta)delta3ight) random edges, asymptotically almost surely (a.a.s. hereafter) results in a Hamiltonian graph. This bound on the size of the random perturbation is only tight when delta is independent of n and deteriorates as to become uninformative when delta=Omegaleft(n−1/3ight). We prove several improvements and extensions of the aforementioned result. First, keeping the bound on alpha(G) as above and allowing for delta=Omega(n−1/3), we determine the correct order of magnitude of the number of random edges whose addition to G a.a.s. results in a pancyclic graph. Our second result ventures into significantly sparser graphs G; it delivers an almost tight bound on the size of the random perturbation required to ensure pancyclicity a.a.s., assuming delta(G)=Omegaleft((alpha(G)logn)2ight) and alpha(G)delta(G)=O(n). Assuming the correctness of Chv'atal's toughness conjecture, allows for the mitigation of the condition alpha(G)=Oleft(delta2night) imposed above, by requiring alpha(G)=O(delta(G)) instead; our third result determines, for a wide range of values of delta(G), the correct order of magnitude of the size of the random perturbation required to ensure the a.a.s. pancyclicity of G. For the emergence of nearly spanning cycles, our fourth result determines, under milder conditions, the correct order of magnitude of the size of the random perturbation required to ensure that a.a.s. G contains such a cycle.



Cites work









This page was built for publication: Cycle lengths in randomly perturbed graphs

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6063344)