vehicle

From MaRDI portal
Dataset:6032910



OpenML54MaRDI QIDQ6032910

OpenML dataset with id 54

No author found.

Full work available at URL: https://api.openml.org/data/v1/download/54/vehicle.arff

Upload date: 6 April 2014



Dataset Characteristics

Number of classes: 4
Number of features: 19 (numeric: 18, symbolic: 1 and in total binary: 0 )
Number of instances: 846
Number of instances with missing values: 0
Number of missing values: 0

Author: Dr. Pete Mowforth and Dr. Barry Shepherd Source: UCI) Please cite: Siebert,JP. Turing Institute Research Memorandum TIRM-87-018 "Vehicle Recognition Using Rule Based Methods" (March 1987)

NAME
        vehicle silhouettes

PURPOSE
        to classify a given silhouette as one of four types of vehicle,
        using  a set of features extracted from the silhouette. The
        vehicle may be viewed from one of many different angles.  

PROBLEM TYPE
        classification
        
SOURCE
        Drs.Pete Mowforth and Barry Shepherd
        Turing Institute
        George House
        36 North Hanover St.
        Glasgow
        G1 2AD

CONTACT
        Alistair Sutherland
        Statistics Dept.
        Strathclyde University
        Livingstone Tower
        26 Richmond St.
        GLASGOW G1 1XH
        Great Britain
        
        Tel: 041 552 4400 x3033
        
        Fax: 041 552 4711 
        
        e-mail: alistair@uk.ac.strathclyde.stams

HISTORY
        This data was originally gathered at the TI in 1986-87 by
        JP Siebert. It was partially financed by Barr and Stroud Ltd.
        The original purpose was to find a method of distinguishing
        3D objects within a 2D image by application of an ensemble of
        shape feature extractors to the 2D silhouettes of the objects.
        Measures of shape features extracted from example silhouettes
        of objects to be discriminated were used to generate a class-
        ification rule tree by means of computer induction.
         This object recognition strategy was successfully used to 
        discriminate between silhouettes of model cars, vans and buses
        viewed from constrained elevation but all angles of rotation.
         The rule tree classification performance compared favourably
        to MDC (Minimum Distance Classifier) and k-NN (k-Nearest Neigh-
        bour) statistical classifiers in terms of both error rate and
        computational efficiency. An investigation of these rule trees
        generated by example indicated that the tree structure was 
        heavily influenced by the orientation of the objects, and grouped
        similar object views into single decisions.

DESCRIPTION
         The features were extracted from the silhouettes by the HIPS
        (Hierarchical Image Processing System) extension BINATTS, which 
        extracts a combination of scale independent features utilising
        both classical moments based measures such as scaled variance,
        skewness and kurtosis about the major/minor axes and heuristic
        measures such as hollows, circularity, rectangularity and
        compactness.
         Four "Corgie" model vehicles were used for the experiment:
        a double decker bus, Cheverolet van, Saab 9000 and an Opel Manta 400.
        This particular combination of vehicles was chosen with the 
        expectation that the bus, van and either one of the cars would
        be readily distinguishable, but it would be more difficult to
        distinguish between the cars.
         The images were acquired by a camera looking downwards at the
        model vehicle from a fixed angle of elevation (34.2 degrees
        to the horizontal). The vehicles were placed on a diffuse
        backlit surface (lightbox). The vehicles were painted matte black
        to minimise highlights. The images were captured using a CRS4000
        framestore connected to a vax 750. All images were captured with
        a spatial resolution of 128x128 pixels quantised to 64 greylevels.
        These images were thresholded to produce binary vehicle silhouettes,
        negated (to comply with the processing requirements of BINATTS) and
        thereafter subjected to shrink-expand-expand-shrink HIPS modules to
        remove "salt and pepper" image noise.
         The vehicles were rotated and their angle of orientation was measured
        using a radial graticule beneath the vehicle. 0 and 180 degrees
        corresponded to "head on" and "rear" views respectively while 90 and
        270 corresponded to profiles in opposite directions. Two sets of
        60 images, each set covering a full 360 degree rotation, were captured
        for each vehicle. The vehicle was rotated by a fixed angle between 
        images. These datasets are known as e2 and e3 respectively.
         A further two sets of images, e4 and e5, were captured with the camera 
        at elevations of 37.5 degs and 30.8 degs respectively. These sets
        also contain 60 images per vehicle apart from e4.van which contains
        only 46 owing to the difficulty of containing the van in the image
        at some orientations.

ATTRIBUTES
        
        COMPACTNESS     (average perim)2/area
        
        CIRCULARITY     (average radius)2/area
        
        DISTANCE CIRCULARITY    area/(av.distance from border)2
        
        RADIUS RATIO    (max.rad-min.rad)/av.radius
        
        PR.AXIS ASPECT RATIO    (minor axis)/(major axis)
        
        MAX.LENGTH ASPECT RATIO (length perp. max length)/(max length)
        
        SCATTER RATIO   (inertia about minor axis)/(inertia about major axis)
        
        ELONGATEDNESS           area/(shrink width)2
        
        PR.AXIS RECTANGULARITY  area/(pr.axis length*pr.axis width)
        
        MAX.LENGTH RECTANGULARITY area/(max.length*length perp. to this)
        
        SCALED VARIANCE         (2nd order moment about minor axis)/area
        ALONG MAJOR AXIS
        
        SCALED VARIANCE         (2nd order moment about major axis)/area
        ALONG MINOR AXIS 
        
        SCALED RADIUS OF GYRATION       (mavar+mivar)/area
        
        SKEWNESS ABOUT  (3rd order moment about major axis)/sigma_min3
        MAJOR AXIS
        
        SKEWNESS ABOUT  (3rd order moment about minor axis)/sigma_maj3
        MINOR AXIS
                
        KURTOSIS ABOUT  (4th order moment about major axis)/sigma_min4
        MINOR AXIS  
                
        KURTOSIS ABOUT  (4th order moment about minor axis)/sigma_maj4
        MAJOR AXIS
        
        HOLLOWS RATIO   (area of hollows)/(area of bounding polygon)
        
         Where sigma_maj2 is the variance along the major axis and
        sigma_min2 is the variance along the minor axis, and
        
        area of hollows= area of bounding poly-area of object 
        
         The area of the bounding polygon is found as a side result of
        the computation to find the maximum length. Each individual
        length computation yields a pair of calipers to the object
        orientated at every 5 degrees. The object is propagated into
        an image containing the union of these calipers to obtain an
        image of the bounding polygon. 
        
NUMBER OF CLASSES

        4       OPEL, SAAB, BUS, VAN

NUMBER OF EXAMPLES

                Total no. = 946
                
                No. in each class
                
                  opel 240
                  saab 240
                  bus  240
                  van  226
                
                
                100 examples are being kept by Strathclyde for validation.
                So StatLog partners will receive 846 examples.

NUMBER OF ATTRIBUTES

                No. of atts. = 18





This page was built for dataset: vehicle