Hedging Our Bet on Forest Permanence for the Economic Viability of Climate Targets – Model Output and Results
DOI10.5281/zenodo.14772622Zenodo14772622MaRDI QIDQ6675303FDOQ6675303
Dataset published at Zenodo repository.
Michael Windisch, Leon Merfort, Gunnar Luderer, Christoph Müller, Florian Humpenöder, Jan Philipp Dietrich, Hermann Lotze-Campen, Jens Heinke, Nico Bauer, Gabriel Abrahão, Alexander Popp
Publication date: 30 January 2025
Copyright license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Hedging Our Bet on Forest Permanence for the Economic Viability of Climate Targets Model Output and Results Contact: michael.windisch@env.ethz.ch Contents This repository contains model output from the REMIND and/or MAgPIE models used in the assessment for the manuscript"Hedging Our Bet on Forest Permanence for the Economic Viability of Climate Targets". The data is provided in Model Intercomparison Format (.mif) and includes the following attributes: Model Scenario Region Variable Unit Period Value .mif Files The .mif (Model Intercomparison Format) is a structured text format. The files in this repository are semicolon-separated (CSV-like), with headers defining key attributes. They can be processed using any software that supports delimited text, including R and Python. For IAM-specific analysis, tailored packages like quitte (https://github.com/pik-piam/quitte) in R provide convenient tools for handling .mif files. Data Structure The model output is organized into folders based on experimental setups, as follows: Control Runs (control) Simulations without forest carbon loss. 1.5C and 2C Experiments (1.5degC, 2degC) Scenarios meeting climate targets despite forest carbon loss, with disturbance rates of: 0.2% (FCL-002) 0.4% (FCL-004) 0.8% (FCL-008) 1.6% (FCL-016) Sensitivity Experiments (sensitivity), further divided into: GCM Varying Global Circulation Model (GCM) inputs SSP Varying Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP) assumptions File Naming Convention Each file follows the naming pattern: {ssp}-{climate goal}-FCL-{response type}-{response time}-{gcm}.mif Control scenarios only include {ssp} and {climate goal} since they do not experience forest carbon loss or a response to it. Sensitivity analyses include variations in {gcm}.
This page was built for dataset: Hedging Our Bet on Forest Permanence for the Economic Viability of Climate Targets – Model Output and Results
