Robust group- but limited individual-level (longitudinal) reliability and insights into cross-phases response prediction of conditioned fear

DOI10.5281/zenodo.7323547Zenodo7323547MaRDI QIDQ6692600FDOQ6692600

Dataset published at Zenodo repository.

Tina B. Lonsdorf, Maren Klingelhöfer-Jens, Vincent Keyaniyan, Mana R. Ehlers, Manuel Kuhn

Publication date: 15 March 2022

Copyright license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Description

Here we follow the call to target measurement reliability as a key prerequisite for individual-level predictions in translational neuroscience by investigating i) longitudinal reliability at the individual and ii) group level, iii) internal consistency and iv) response predictability across experimental phases. 120 individuals performed a fear conditioning paradigm twice six months apart. Analyses of skin conductance responses, fear ratings and blood oxygen level dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD fMRI) with different data transformations and included numbers of trials were conducted. While longitudinal reliability was rather limited at the individual level, it was comparatively higher for acquisition but not extinction at the group-level. Internal consistency was satisfactory. Higher responding in preceding phases predicted higher responding in subsequent experimental phases at a weak to moderate level depending on data specifications. In sum, the results suggest that while individual-level predictions are meaningful for (very) short time frames, they also call for more attention to measurement properties in the field.

This page was built for dataset: Robust group- but limited individual-level (longitudinal) reliability and insights into cross-phases response prediction of conditioned fear