Data for: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Drosophila short-term-memory genetics: robust reproducibility, but little independent replication

From MaRDI portal
Dataset:6720013



DOI10.5281/zenodo.1307126Zenodo1307126MaRDI QIDQ6720013FDOQ6720013

Dataset published at Zenodo repository.

Tayfun Tumkaya, Adam Claridge-Chang, Stanislav Ott

Publication date: 28 June 2018

Copyright license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International



All the data, code, analyses, and figures used in the study entitled: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Drosophila short-term-memory genetics: robust reproducibility, but little independent replication (doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/247650) Abstract Geneticists have long used olfactory conditioning techniques inDrosophilato identify the neurons and genes that mediate learning. While this method has characterized an abundance of memory-related genes, little is known about how these genes induce short-term memory (STM) via signaling pathways; characterizing these networks will be essential to developing mechanistic models of memory formation. Here, we investigated why elucidating the STM pathways has been relatively slow. One possibility is that the STM evidence base is weak due to publication of poorly reproducible results, as has been observed in other fields. We examined this hypothesis by performing a systematic review and subsequent meta-analysis of the STM genetics field. Using several metrics to quantify the variation between discovery articles and follow-up studies, we found that seven genes were highly replicated, showed no publication bias, and had generally high reproducibility. However, the remaining ~80% memory genes have not been replicated since their initial discovery. Although we observed only a few studies that investigated gene interactions, the reviewed genes could together account for 1000% memory. This large summed effect size indicates either that some of the gene findings are not reproducible, that many memory genes participate in shared pathways, or that current protocols lack the specificity needed to identify core plasticity memory genes. Mechanistic theories of memory and cognition will require the convergence of evidence from system, circuit, cellular, molecular, and genetic experiments. As this study demonstrates, systematic data synthesis is an essential tool for this integrated brain science.







This page was built for dataset: Data for: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Drosophila short-term-memory genetics: robust reproducibility, but little independent replication