Decidability of liveness for concurrent objects on the TSO memory model
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: An important property of concurrent objects is whether they support progress -a special case of liveness-guarantees, which ensure the termination of individual method calls under system fairness assumptions. Liveness properties have been proposed for concurrent objects. Typical liveness properties includelock-freedom,wait-freedom,deadlock-freedom,starvation-freedom and obstruction-freedom. It is known that the five liveness properties above are decidable on the Sequential Consistency (SC) memory model for a bounded number of processes. However, the problem of decidability of liveness for finite state concurrent programs running on relaxed memory models remains open. In this paper we address this problem for the Total Store Order (TSO) memory model,as found in the x86 architecture. We prove that lock-freedom, wait-freedom,deadlock-freedom and starvation-freedom are undecidable on TSO for a bounded number of processes, while obstruction-freedom is decidable.
Recommendations
Cites work
- A variant of a recursively unsolvable problem
- Characterizing progress properties of concurrent objects via contextual refinements
- Checking and enforcing robustness against TSO
- Concurrent Library Correctness on the TSO Memory Model
- Handbook of model checking
- How to Make a Multiprocessor Computer That Correctly Executes Multiprocess Programs
- Mathematizing C++ concurrency
- On some variants of Post's correspondence problem
- On the verification problem for weak memory models
- Show no weakness: sequentially consistent specifications of TSO libraries
- The Java memory model
- TSO-to-TSO linearizability is undecidable
- Undecidable verification problems for programs with unreliable channels
This page was built for publication: Decidability of liveness for concurrent objects on the TSO memory model
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6168984)