Divination of closed-loop stability and performance via frequency response function estimates
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- Verifying stabilizing controllers for performance improvement using closed‐loop data
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3854942
- On validating closed-loop behaviour from noisy frequency-response measurements
- Robust performance assessment of feedback control systems
- Closed-loop identification with an unstable or nonminimum phase controller
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 829791 (Why is no real title available?)
- A direct relation between a signal time series and its unwrapped phase
- A time-domain approach to model validation
- Closed-loop identification with an unstable or nonminimum phase controller
- Controller certification
- Controller validation
- Direct data-driven recursive controller unfalsification with analytic update
- Frequency domain system identification with missing data
- Model validation for control and controller validation in a prediction error identification framework. I: Theory
- Model validation for control and controller validation in a prediction error identification framework. II: Illustrations
- Phase unwrapping by factorization
- Safe Adaptive Switching Control: Stability and Convergence
- The unfalsified control concept and learning
- Uncertainty and feedback. \(H_\infty\) loop-shaping and the \(\nu\)-gap metric
- Validating Controllers for Internal Stability Utilizing Closed-Loop Data
Cited in
(3)
This page was built for publication: Divination of closed-loop stability and performance via frequency response function estimates
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q445981)