Do distributed differentially-private protocols require oblivious transfer?

DOI10.4230/LIPICS.ICALP.2016.29MaRDI QIDQ4598165zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Vipul Goyal, Dakshita Khurana, Ilya Mironov, Omkant Pandey, Amit Sahai

Publication date 19 December 2017

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.4230/lipics.icalp.2016.29

zbMATH Keywords

distributed differential privacynoisy channelsoblivious transferweak noisy channels

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Cryptography (94A60)

Recommendations

• Black-box separations for differentially private protocols
• Accuracy-Privacy Tradeoffs for Two-Party Differentially Private Protocols
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1955807
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1951618
• Communication-efficient distributed oblivious transfer

Cited in

(6)

• Channels of small log-ratio leakage and characterization of two-party differentially private computation
• Black-box separations for differentially private protocols
• Separating computational and statistical differential privacy in the client-server model
• The complexity of differential privacy
• Computational two-party correlation: a dichotomy for key-agreement protocols
• Computationally differentially private inner-product protocols imply oblivious transfer

This page was built for publication: Do distributed differentially-private protocols require oblivious transfer?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4598165)