Entanglement at distance: qubits versus continuous variables

DOI10.1002/PROP.200310064MaRDI QIDQ4406132zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors M. F. Sacchi, Giacomo Mauro D'Ariano

Publication date 25 June 2003

Published in Fortschritte der Physik (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0205073

zbMATH Keywords

maximally entangled photon states

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Quantum computation (81P68) Quantum optics (81V80) Channel models (including quantum) in information and communication theory (94A40)

Abstract: We consider the problem of obtaining maximally entangled photon states at distance in the presence of loss. We compare the efficiency of two different schemes in establishing $N$ shared ebits: i) $N$ single ebit states with the qubit encoded on polarization; ii) a single continuous variable entangled state (emode) assisted by optimal local operation and classical communication (LOCC) protocol in order to obtain a $2^N$-dimensional maximally entangled state, with qubits encoded on the photon number.

Recommendations

• Entanglement transfer from continuous variables to qubits
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1891628
• Entanglement purification with hybrid systems
• Entanglement acquirement from continuous variable system
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5595818

Cited in

(1)

• Would one rather store squeezing or entanglement in continuous variable quantum memories?

This page was built for publication: Entanglement at distance: qubits versus continuous variables

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4406132)