Estimating accuracy of electrostatic finite element models

DOI10.1002/CNM.674MaRDI QIDQ4736801zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Diana N. A. Shaul, Timothy J. Sumner

Publication date 6 August 2004

Published in Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.674

zbMATH Keywords

electrostaticserror analysisfinite element methodLISA

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Electro- and magnetostatics (78A30) Finite element, Galerkin and related methods applied to problems in optics and electromagnetic theory (78M10)

Recommendations

• Direct finite element solution for the capacitance, conductance or inductance, and force in linear electrostatic and magnetostatic problems
• Comparison of pull-in voltages in MEMS using 3D FEM and analytical approaches
• A methodology for fast finite element modeling of electrostatically actuated MEMS
• Modeling electrostatic force microscopy for conductive and dielectric samples using the boundary element method
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1264166

Cites work

• Local error indicator in finite element analysis of Laplacian fields based on the green integration formula

Cited in

(2)

• Direct finite element solution for the capacitance, conductance or inductance, and force in linear electrostatic and magnetostatic problems
• CAD Model Simplification Error Estimation for Electrostatics Problems

This page was built for publication: Estimating accuracy of electrostatic finite element models

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4736801)