Experimental verification of super-Sbox analysis -- confirmation of detailed attack complexity
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- Finding Collisions in the Full SHA-1
- How to Break MD5 and Other Hash Functions
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1682693 (Why is no real title available?)
- Hyper-Sbox view of AES-like permutations: a generalized distinguisher
- Improved cryptanalysis of the reduced Grøstl compression function, ECHO permutation and AES block cipher
- Improved differential attacks for ECHO and Grøstl
- Known-Key Distinguishers for Some Block Ciphers
- Non-full-active Super-Sbox analysis: applications to ECHO and Grøstl
- Rebound attack on the full Lane compression function
- Rebound distinguishers: results on the full Whirlpool compression function
- Super-Sbox Cryptanalysis: Improved Attacks for AES-Like Permutations
- The Rebound Attack: Cryptanalysis of Reduced Whirlpool and Grøstl
Cited in
(6)- Anomalies and vector space search: tools for S-box analysis
- The rebound attack and subspace distinguishers: application to Whirlpool
- Correction to: ``Dispelling myths on superposition attacks: formal security model and attack analyses
- Improved rebound attacks on AESQ: core permutation of CAESAR candidate PAEQ
- Super-Sbox Cryptanalysis: Improved Attacks for AES-Like Permutations
- Dispelling myths on superposition attacks: formal security model and attack analyses
This page was built for publication: Experimental verification of super-Sbox analysis -- confirmation of detailed attack complexity
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3098004)