Exponential domination in subcubic graphs

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: As a natural variant of domination in graphs, Dankelmann et al. [Domination with exponential decay, Discrete Math. 309 (2009) 5877-5883] introduce exponential domination, where vertices are considered to have some dominating power that decreases exponentially with the distance, and the dominated vertices have to accumulate a sufficient amount of this power emanating from the dominating vertices. More precisely, if S is a set of vertices of a graph G, then S is an exponential dominating set of G if sumlimitsvinSleft(frac12ight)mdist(G,S)(u,v)−1geq1 for every vertex u in V(G)setminusS, where mdist(G,S)(u,v) is the distance between uinV(G)setminusS and vinS in the graph G−(Ssetminusv). The exponential domination number gammae(G) of G is the minimum order of an exponential dominating set of G. In the present paper we study exponential domination in subcubic graphs. Our results are as follows: If G is a connected subcubic graph of order n(G), then frac{n(G)}{6log_2(n(G)+2)+4}leq gamma_e(G)leq frac{1}{3}(n(G)+2). For every epsilon>0, there is some g such that gammae(G)leqepsilonn(G) for every cubic graph G of girth at least g. For every 0<alpha<frac23ln(2), there are infinitely many cubic graphs G with gammae(G)leqfrac3n(G)ln(n(G))alpha. If T is a subcubic tree, then gammae(T)geqfrac16(n(T)+2). For a given subcubic tree, gammae(T) can be determined in polynomial time. The minimum exponential dominating set problem is APX-hard for subcubic graphs.


Summary: As a natural variant of domination in graphs, \textit{P. Dankelmann} et al. [Discrete Math. 309, No. 19, 5877--5883 (2009; Zbl 1191.05070)] introduced exponential domination, where vertices are considered to have some dominating power that decreases exponentially with the distance, and the dominated vertices have to accumulate a sufficient amount of this power emanating from the dominating vertices. More precisely, if \(S\) is a set of vertices of a graph \(G\), then \(S\) is an exponential dominating set of \(G\) if \(\sum\limits_{v\in S}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{\mathrm{dist}_{(G,S)}(u,v)-1}\geq 1\) for every vertex \(u\) in \(V(G)\setminus S\), where \(\mathrm{dist}_{(G,S)}(u,v)\) is the distance between \(u\in V(G)\setminus S\) and \(v\in S\) in the graph \(G-(S\setminus \{ v\})\). The exponential domination number \(\gamma_e(G)\) of \(G\) is the minimum order of an exponential dominating set of \(G\).{ }In the present paper we study exponential domination in subcubic graphs. Our results are as follows: If \(G\) is a connected subcubic graph of order \(n(G)\), then \[ \frac{n(G)}{6\log_2(n(G)+2)+4}\leq \gamma_e(G)\leq \frac{1}{3}(n(G)+2). \] For every \(\varepsilon0\), there is some \(g\) such that \(\gamma_e(G)\leq \varepsilon n(G)\) for every cubic graph \(G\) of girth at least \(g\). For every \(0\alpha\frac{2}{3\ln(2)}\), there are infinitely many cubic graphs \(G\) with \(\gamma_e(G)\leq \frac{3n(G)}{\ln(n(G))^{\alpha}}\). If \(T\) is a subcubic tree, then \(\gamma_e(T)\geq \frac{1}{6}(n(T)+2).\) For a given subcubic tree, \(\gamma_e(T)\) can be determined in polynomial time. The minimum exponential dominating set problem is APX-hard for subcubic graphs.











This page was built for publication: Exponential domination in subcubic graphs

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q504979)