Extracting Structural Damage Features: Comparison Between PCA and ICA

DOI10.1007/978-3-540-37258-5_101MaRDI QIDQ3063181zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Luo Zhong, Huazhu Song, Bo Han

Publication date 30 December 2010

Published in Intelligent Computing in Signal Processing and Pattern Recognition (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-37258-5_101

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Pattern recognition, speech recognition (68T10) Computing methodologies for image processing (68U10) Image processing (compression, reconstruction, etc.) in information and communication theory (94A08)

Recommendations

• Structural damage detection by integrating independent component analysis and support vector machine
• Enhanced features in principal component analysis with spatial and temporal windows for damage identification
• Improving structure damage identification by using ICA-ANN based sensitivity analysis
• Structural damage detection with damage induction vector and best achievable vector
• Structural Damage Identification Using Assigned Partial Eigenstructure
• Vibration-based construction and extraction of structural damage feature index
• Analyses on structural damage identification based on combined parameters
• Comparison of two techniques for implementing the proper orthogonal decomposition method in damage detection problems

Cited in

(4)

• Damage detection of refractory based on principle component analysis and Gaussian mixture model
• Improving structure damage identification by using ICA-ANN based sensitivity analysis
• Enhanced features in principal component analysis with spatial and temporal windows for damage identification
• Mechanism of principal component analysis in structural dynamics under ambient excitation

This page was built for publication: Extracting Structural Damage Features: Comparison Between PCA and ICA

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q3063181)