Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation

DOI10.1016/J.JET.2007.11.001MaRDI QIDQ938056zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Philippe Mongin

Publication date 18 August 2008

Published in Journal of Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://philarchive.org/rec/MONFOT

zbMATH Keywords

Pareto principleindependence of irrelevant alternativesdiscursive dilemmajudgment aggregationimpossibility theoremsdoctrinal paradoxlogical aggregation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Fundamental topics (basic mathematics, methodology; applicable to economics in general) (91B02)

Recommendations

• Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
• Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
• Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
• Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas
• The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3670430 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1378599 (Why is no real title available?)
• Aggregation of binary evaluations
• Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case
• Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
• Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
• Social choice and individual values

Cited in

(35)

• Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others
• Philippe Mongin 1950--2020
• Aggregation of binary evaluations with abstentions
• Majority voting on restricted domains
• Probabilistic opinion pooling generalized. II: The premise-based approach
• Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation
• The logic of group decisions: judgment aggregation
• Neutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregation
• Judgment aggregation and the problem of tracking the truth
• The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review
• Aggregating with reason(s)
• The impossibility of unbiased judgment aggregation
• Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas
• Approximately classic judgement aggregation
• Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
• Aggregation of binary evaluations
• Introduction to judgment aggregation
• Justifiable group choice
• The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation
• Introduction to judgment aggregation
• The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications
• On the computational complexity of non-dictatorial aggregation
• Philippe Mongin (1950-2020)
• The median rule in judgement aggregation
• The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory
• Aggregation of non-binary evaluations
• A theorem on aggregating classifications
• Judgment aggregation without full rationality
• AGM contraction is not reconstructible as a descriptor operation
• Logic and majority voting
• A generalised model of judgment aggregation
• Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case
• Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case
• Judgment aggregation in nonmonotonic logic
• Guilbaud's 1952 theorem on the logical problem of aggregation

This page was built for publication: Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q938056)