Fidelity in Mathematical Discourse: Is One and One Really Two?

DOI10.2307/2316620MaRDI QIDQ5636838zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Philip J. Davis

Publication date 1972

Published in The American Mathematical Monthly (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.2307/2316620

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Cited in

(12)

• Social processes and proofs of theorems and programs
• Mathematics has a front and a back
• Some proposals for reviving the philosophy of mathematics
• Is mathematics problem solving or theorem proving?
• Acceptable gaps in mathematical proofs
• Mathematical arguments in context
• Experimental mathematics, computers and the a priori
• Miracles, misconceptions and scotomas in the theory of solitary waves
• Linearity and Reflexivity in the Growth of Mathematical Knowledge
• Values, gender and images of mathematics: a philosophical perspective
• The role of testimony in mathematics
• Mathematical naturalism: origins, guises, and prospects

This page was built for publication: Fidelity in Mathematical Discourse: Is One and One Really Two?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5636838)